But what ... is it good for?
It really is a nice theory.
The only defect I think it has is probably common to
all philosophical theories.
It's wrong.
    • Book 1 finale: They blew up the boat (´_`)
    • Book 2 finale: They blew up the Avatars ╥﹏╥
    • Book 3 finale: I died a little I can't even make a joke about this
    • 212
  • chewytriforce:

    i’m so hurt by the finale

    • 1018
    • 1018
  • (Source: lungbender, via forevergirlkorra)

    • 288
    • 288
  • (Source: fcuk-my-actual-life, via shw5ii)

    • 776
    • 776
  • whosaprettypolyglot:

    Part 1 - playing cards

    (playing) cards - des cartes (à jouer) [nfpl]

    pack/deck - le jeu de cartes

    to shuffle - mélanger

    suit - la couleur

    hearts - coeur

    diamonds - carreau

    clubs - trèfle (literally “clover”)

    spades - pique

    ace - l’as [nm, /as/]

    • 39
  • phoneticmeow:

    britney2007spears:

    fun on the right, business on the left

    I’m seriously concerned my left or her left

    (Source: fivegum, via ruinedchildhood)

    • 193425
    • 193425
  • o-eheu:

    interretialia:

    o-eheu:

    LatinTutorial does a great job explaining the tenses in his video A Theory of Tenses. Without undermining his work, I’d like to propose a different way of thinking about tenses, the way I use. If you’re getting confused, turn back…

    • 94
  • silohouettes:

    My friend just made this status

    (via lunawho47)

    • 230124
    • 230124
  • (Source: icaruvs, via versace-beards)

    • 1141
    • 1141